Tag Archives: Constitution

Final Project is on the ERA movement of the 1960’s

My Final Project is on the ERA movement Better Known as Evil Right Away, because that is what it was. Someone lied to you in telling you Religion was only a personal responsible (not binding on any other person) and its Authority was not universal neither was its application to the entirety of mankind and this was a lie as well so I speak only to the Christian here my words are wasted on the non-believers.
Someone told you that God changes His mind and his laws just for you and yes this is a lie too, Rom.2:11 for God is not a man that he should Lie, Num. 23:19. Some of you hold the view that the Biblical Text is the work of men and has changed over the Centuries as is the teaching of the Tubingen School of Thought that holds the position that the scribes changed the word of God over time to fit the Coming of Christ and Christianity and this too is a lie and is provable. They stated that when we research Texts from the past that it will show the gradual changes that were made from the Text we have today and their sugar stick was Isaiah 53 (note that word past tense). An extant copy of Isa. 53 was found in the in the Dead Sea Scrolls and the scholars one of which was my Professor at ACU and a graduate of Pepperdine University in Old Testament Studies who I studied Greek under, these men found after they examined the 2 Texts, one from the Dead Sea called The Great Isaiah Scroll dating back to 100 BCE against the oldest know until that time which our Biblical Text is based on Dated at 1000 AD and reading them side by side and read they are the same. You ask what does that prove?, it proves the evolutionary progression did not exist in the Biblical Text as the Tubingen School theorized and their scholarship and the modernism they declare is a lie. Why don’t you hear about this, because people do not want the truth told, it affirms God is real and mans lies toward God are somehow being hidden. This is not the only evidence there is much, much more such as the “Aveeroo” (transliteration) being found not as a modern understanding of the Word as the Tubingen school’s used it and as they told us but found a thousand years before the Hebrews were known to exist and proving their existence, as the Biblical Text has told us, contrary to Liberal teaching even though the enemies of the Hebrews sought to eradicate them and Gods Word throughout their existence in History. God Word never changers only the lies of men toward God. You won’t hear the import of this understanding because modern scholarship (Rational Religion) rejects the Truth and prefers the good story telling like that of our Ms. GxxxE and others appreciate where truth and its implications are turned into a lie, no difference that the original lie for women who had a movement, which started with “ye shall be as gods knowing the difference between good and evil’ like then and now not recognizing the implications of their actions or accepting the responsibility like men do. You cannot return (It’s how sin entered the world), its documented, its provable and its Authority unquestionable. Notice I did not say that it could not be disobeyed or lied about, or questioned by infidels who keep the party line told till people get tired enough of hearing it and accept the false teachings trading the Truth for a lie and there are many false teachers, just compare what God says (not what I tell you, no debate tricks with and attack on man to discredit me), compare what they teach and what God says “Study” , there are many false teachers just look around you at those who teach things contrary to the teaching of God. Don’t be angry with me be angry with God he is the one you go against, so be honest like men of God you wish to be equal with and accept responsibility for the lies (with God there is no compromise) when you hold the positions of men not God. Mankind has never changed in History in its gossip, backbiting, and its lewdness like when Moses returned for the mountain with God’s Law only to find Aaron a priest of God acquiescing to the demands of the people to take them back to Egypt and committing Idolatry and lewdness not recognizing their utter disregard for what God had given them or the like the Answer to Chxxxxxxe Sxxxxr who claims that because it was allowed means it was approved by God in Biblical times with female Judges and Prophetess has failed to study 1 Sam. 8:4-20 and learn that it was a rejection of God with the Kings (it was an evil time with a stiffnecked people) and a disgrace and for the hardness of their heart God allowed it and taught the lessons which needed to be learned (be careful what you ask God for he may just give it to you). 1Sam 8:7 Notice what God said to Samuel, “And the LORD said unto Samuel, Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee: for they have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me, that I should not reign over them.” Or did you forget the Kings were not a blessing but a curse of the taskmaster and then use that to justify that it was approved by God, you wrest the scriptures to you own destruction and this is where false teaching begins applying Scripture where it does not apply with a meaning you can apply, not recognizing the influence to a cause that is contrary to the Word of God or Plan of God. This is not about what I believe your problems are with God but what He tells you if you listen. This movement is concerned with how equal you are to the men of sin, glory and the lust for power not just being able to survive but wanting it your way rather than what God actually teaches. Wanting to be of the world and more like the world than Godly and lying to yourselves to justify this fact only shows you misunderstanding of the Biblical Text and its application. No Christian has the right to go against Scripture, read the Book for women doing these things proves you are not a Christian for by definition a Christian is one who belongs to Christ and follows Christ and yes we as Christian can hold each other accountable 1 Peter 3:15 this is the Law of Christ (not referencing the misquote “ we are not under the Law referring “The Old Law of Sin and Death” different impetus there) and are held to Biblical Authority not men’s but Gods we as Christians are demanded to unlike the world of Sin and Death who have no hope.
To the rest of the class who laugh and scorn at these words as one man’s opinion, “you do greatly err not knowing the scriptures neither the power of God”. We have the right in this country, God given, not instituted by men neither given by man nor can it be infringed that is Constitutional and so is the right to speak, before you say a word study what I tell you, before you ridicule without knowledge or wisdom. Until you are familiar enough with the Text don’t citizen unless you just want to incite and show ignorance. To the Christian it is a matter of Service to God but to you and enslavement of mankind steeped in the Raw Base Animalistic and heathen understanding of non- belief, Biblical religion is not you make it up as you go that’s a fairy tale Ms. Gemme I’m sure can teach you many fairy tale if you ask her she seems pretty good at it but that doen’t solve the issues of mankind. When you misapply and reject the Biblical Authority as a fairytale and as story telling you commit the Unpardonable Sin which cannot be forgiven, so beware in denying the Holy Spirit, His Word has come. When you deny that there is no hope and you are left to your own devices. Don’t ever say you were never told or I didn’t know, all you can say is I didn’t care see Mark 3:22-30, Matt. 12 31-32 and its understanding applies see: Mark 3:22-27 and Luke 11:14-23 and for the Scholarly who know who the Respected Christian theologian Dr. F.F. Bruce is he writes, “…Speaking against the Son of man might be due to a failure to recognize Him for what He is. So Paul recalls how in his pre-Christian days he thought it his duty to oppose the name of Jesus of Nazareth. But if, having seen the light on the Damascus road, he had deliberately closed his eyes to it and kicked out against the goad which was directing him into the true path, that would have been the sin against the Holy Spirit.
The Holy Spirit persuades and enables men to accept Christ and enjoy the saving benefits of the gospel [John 16:8; 1 Corinthians 2:12-14; Acts 7:51], but if anyone refuses to submit to the Spirit’s gracious constraint, preferring to call good evil and evil good, how can the gospel avail for him? The deliberate refusal of the grace of God is the one sin which by its very nature is irremediable” [F.F. Bruce, Answers to Questions (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1973), pp. 46-47.].
“Anyone who rejects the Holy Spirit’s convicting influence and does not repent will not be forgiven, ‘neither in this world, neither in the world to come’ (Matthew 12:32)” [Ray Comfort, “The Unpardonable Sin,” The Evidence Bible (Gainesville, Florida: Bridge-Logo Publishers, 2001).].

Taken from for those who wish to research this further:
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/unpardonablesin.html

I tell this day not everyone goes to Heaven and not all religions are the same and not all gods are true, universalism is the tool of the False Teacher against the one true God and on this I Stand. This is not my pulpit, it is not my word, your problem is with God not me so if you have that problem you will meet him shortly, your life is short and I urge everyone to do what is written in 2 Tim. 2:15. In some ways I see Hope in Others I see what caused Jesus to weep in the garden and His statement before he died his prayer “Father forgive them for they know not what they do.” , but now you have no excuse you know what you do and the only excuse you can have is Laxness, backbiting, false teaching and a blatant disregard for what God teaches ( by the way its called mocking God for those who don’t get it). I leave you with this understanding for those who still wish to laugh mock and scorn it is you choice to obey to you glory or disobey to you own destruction as for me my responsibility with God for you is done, I’m command to speak not my word but his, personally I would rather choose to be silent rather than go through the mockery and ridicule, it is not easy to have to obey his commands but I have no choice. Lastly for those who do this (Ridicule, Mock and Doubt) I leave you with this what will you say to the Judge of the earth and Universe when he says as he did to Thomas, “Bring forth thy finger… Bring forth thy hand…. See: John 20:27, you were told and this is why I wrote on the ERA amendment. If the professor wishes he may share it with you, I care not, it is up to him, it is the reason I am what I am. As always.
Skip Pallo (Semper Fi)

Leave a comment

Filed under Biblical Witness, Constitution, Philosophy, Political Correctness, Religion, Right Relationships, The 1960's, Universalism

The 1960s encompassed more than the rights of women?

This post is an answer to a Discussion board question posted in on of my University classes.
To what extent do you think the gender movements of the 1960s encompassed more than the rights of women?
I will state this from the outset that this subject make me sick to my stomach, when you realized what you are truly saying so I will be as gentle as I possibly can and will state it now I mean no offense to any however, Truth needs to be told. In 1350 Knights sworn to God and Scripture and to defend those in need, of widows and orphans and to defend the honor of women and to teach them as recorded in the original oaths of knight hood at the time of the first Crusade and chivalry not like the mythical writing of them in stories or poems, as of today but true men of renown and of honor and duty to God. It was the first time in recorded history of a movement to free women from bondage and abuse and it was a Biblical Principal that did so. These men were trained to be warriors, doctors, Lawyers and healers of their time and swore their lives to this end as did the Order of the Garter which the Queen of England is a part of to this very day, but like all good causes it soon fell into dishonor and faded into history. The proper Biblical role from Creation of women is not that Eve was taken from Adam foot as to walk on her or form head that she should be exalted above him but was taken from Adam’s rib closest to his heart, a help meet. She is neither his slave nor his superior, and the twain (the two) shall be as one. I have preached a thousand sermons on this subject, but here it would fall on deaf ears in an amoral society who is more concerned about their sexual prowess, equality to the man’s position, and to the destruction of the Home than servitude to God and country. Feminists have said and hold as a part of their foundation and their tenants that the Bible was written by men to enslave women and see servitude to God as an enslavement, even if he does exist and I have had those feminist types spit on me for what I believed. Their arguments and hatred is misguided toward men their problem is with God, in thirty years all the young boys and girls I have counseled all say the same thing to me, “I just wish my Mommy was at home”, these issues shake the foundations of the family itself and most children won’t ever admit to this because they don’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings no less hurt their mothers. Gangs on the increase in society (both young men and women) who seek family, they seek a place to belong and somewhere where they feel safe and someone to take care of them (so the gang takes care of its own). In the rush to attain equality, it leaves the vacuum in society of our nation youth, while women sought careers and felt justified to do so; we forgot what would happen when Mom wasn’t their anymore or if she is just a part time mom. Mom now preoccupied with her own agenda leaves the family for what she considers to be her own fulfillment that suddenly it was incorrect to follow in her mother’s footsteps her meager position in life being nothing more than a slave to the father of her children and of course there is always a man to blame when things did not work or we can relate the marriage contract to social prostitution like I have heard many women of the sixties discuss. There was always a man who was not at home because he was seeking the same freedom from the Biblical Authority as well and two wrongs do not make a right but that’s not the issue we are discussing here its Feminism, I will deal with the men’s issue later. Women now seeing that there is more to life than duty to family or the husband or God and seeks social time and interests of others, and when marriage or family stops working or they find something better (when in digressions happen) they can just leave (the rise in divorce for any cause) and do all this and claim it was for the good of the children and assume this is justified. Women stating falsely that they only want what men already have, thinking men can have sex at any time and of course women can not, or the men have no shame brought on them for having in digressions seek to have the same equality, they envy men for. Most people of the sixties had no Idea that the infiltration of the American home was already in progress, it was documented in a little book written in 1958 by W. Cleon Skousen by the Ensign Publishing Co. called “The Naked Communist” that chronicles the deceptions we have been fed and what these movements from a social aspect are all about and I am sure Ms. GxxxX can enlighten you on the agenda of these facts being a part of the anti anti-establishment movement herself and if not here are some of the listed goals you will find chronicled in the book per the critique of the book see: http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm Congressional Record–Appendix, pp. A34-A35, January 10, 1963, Current Communist Goals
EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Thursday, January 10, 1963.
[From “The Naked Communist,” by Cleon Skousen]
CURRENT COMMUNIST GOALS
1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.
2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.
3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.
4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.
6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.
7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.
8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev’s promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.
9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.
10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.
11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)
12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.
13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.
14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.
15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
18. Gain control of all student newspapers.
19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.
20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.
21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.”
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”
27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a “religious crutch.”
28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”
29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”
31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the “big picture.” Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.
32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture–education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.
34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.
35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.
36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.
37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.
38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].
39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.
40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use [“]united force[“] to solve economic, political or social problems.
43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.
44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.
45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.

You think what your doing is honorable and a progression of equality but you have been lied to, it all apart of the plan and like sheep you have been misled into destroying the home and the American way of Life to the discredit of not only of your family, American principals but God himself. Research the evidence it speaks for itself. As to the suffrage of women we all agree in equality, but even equality has its limits, even men have limits which all men recognize or are you so biased you cannot see it. Men who have dishonored their families are just as much to blame as the women. Men who left the natural use of the women and likewise the women.
The reference for those who are interested is here see:
Romans 1: 18-32
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed [it] unto them.
20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified [him] not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet.
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in [their] knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,
30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
If you read it, it is clear and if you don’t understand it, I can explain it, for I am well qualified and we can discuss the dodge most people use when they will say: “that just your interpretation” lets talk about what the term interpretation really means and I am fully qualified in this field, we can discuss Hermeneutics if you wish but that not the truth for those who use that line because truth be told they just don’t care. Neither men or women if they are Christians can go against the laws of God and say that it is right, it’s not like we have a choice (It’s not like going to McDonalds Ladies and Gentleman, “Can I take you order please”) Christians have no right to go against God and no one else does either really. These are but a few of the principals our nation was founded on and all Americans need to be careful not to destroy or allow other philosophies or Nations to do the same, it is the only really free country in the world even Canada agrees with that and if we fall so will they. If you are amoral you still understand this shows deviance and the plot thickens when you realized you are being used against our nation from the communist perspective and we have known this fact since 1963. These same issues are not new and I can take you back 1,000 years and show you what was going on today is the same in human existence back then. To cloud the waters of the Rights of Women with Feminism is a travesty for the women of this nation who are equal with their male counterpart in many ways but Feminism destroys the God given rights of the Creator to them and of the recognition given by the founders of this nation. Like the Slave issue it takes time to undo the attitudes of improper men who are appose to Biblical principles. Proper gender issues first should be taught at home, not dictated by schools and the state, or Congress and institutionalize by the justice Department,. Second the problem is most Men feel defeated at home, the loss of who they really are, and how much they now can trust their partners who seek to undermine the home (repercussions of Feminism, abortion, homosexuality and divorce for any cause and the Legal implications) and his authority which God holds him accountable for as the Head of the house hold not the woman. Some have given up because it’s easier to abandon the home for something that looks better, and you as women wondered why they do this, you know why, look at the repercussions of your actions and take responsibility like real men do if you want to be seen as equals. The confusion of gender swapping causes harm to all children and the social acceptance of this type of action only helps to proliferate it, not legitimate it and is condemned again in the Biblical tradition which is not changeable simple because of society or human wisdom thinks it should be so God never changes, his rules stand the same from the beginning Male and Female Created He them. Like children throwing a tantrum when they don’t get what they want, not realizing the danger involved in some actions to everyone in the family ( ie. Mankind) and to themselves again we have a spoiled brat society. Universalism is a danger, Unisex is a danger, and while we experiment with the possibilities as did the ancients to their own destruction, we know the ends of their civilizations, the question you should be asking is who in the world and in their right mind says this is a correct way to live and it must be forced upon the American people by legislation even when it is contrary to the established norm of a Country, and God, by what right, I’ll give you a hint go back and reread the list from the Congressional Record–Appendix, pp. A34-A35, January 10, 1963, Current Communist Goals EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Thursday, January 10, 1963. [From “The Naked Communist,” by Cleon Skousen] or just buy the book, its required reading in Mormonism. Yes, contrary to the false doctrines and apostasy of some religious people who hold there is not a difficulty in their religion concerning Homosexuality (Judaism, Catholicism and others) however there is no major Religion in the world that accepts homosexuality in its teachings or writings (like the Bible), it is condemned by every major religion. Once you have destroyed this nation where will you go then, we know what happened to Sodom and Gomorrah.
The Truth is in front of you but because you firmly believe that all men are to blame it is a justification for women to be as immoral as they possibly can, and even including to the breakdown of the Social values, the home and the abandonment of those they profess to love. If a man were to take a 14 year old girl in to his house at 11:30 at night and there was any impropriety seen by his neighbor the cops and TV crews would crucify him as the biggest pervert in America his picture and life would be ruined immediately, but two lesbian women can have a 14 year old Sheriff’s daughter over for the world to see with their window open to the public and nothing is said it’s just natural because they have a personal right to express themselves and yes I saw this in Kyle, Texas 4 years ago. Male bashing has become a national past time for most women not recognizing that good men are under Law by God to do what is commanded of them but then again women do not care who they hurt their concern is for themselves. Most people of today’s society take an isolationist approach to fighting against the immoral decay of our society a live and let live approach not recognizing that these groups are not interested in merely equal rights or pay for women or genders but the superiority of women and others and completely restructuring society based on human wisdom even if it means destroying this country and its constitution they believe, “so be it”. This war is not simple between men and women as status of equality but it’s hostile to the destruction of Religion and most of the Atheistic, and Homosexual groups agree with this tenant even though today they are more careful not to state it like years ago that all Christians should be killed as not to incite others against their cause and be labeled as a hate group but some still venture to this extent especially in the amoral and Atheistic camps who wish to change from what they call the old regime not recognizing we are teaching a whole new generation about the fallacies of this philosophy. Because the causes of what are deemed minorities like gender benders or deviant cause is not progressing some feel we have stagnated, this is an evolutionary ethic which is a fallacy from the beginning as I have warned before in other discussion boards, Hegelian thought is a flawed philosophy and cyclical in nature and never proves anything by its very nature in logic, it is opposed to it and it is the reason we have Communism and it’s based on it and it is what threatens us. The issues of Homosexuality and Communism under Lenin criminalize it so if your basing your hopes on Communism to free the oppressed sexual minority you may be spending time in prison or worse, not all communism opposes it but it is a tool for them to breakdown the moral conscience of America and gain a foot hold on American society as does the Atheistic Philosophy. When you realize too late the mistakes you are thrusting upon our society, and the revolution begins, when you press good men as far as humanly possible, when reactionism begins, remember the pendulum effect you can’t get away from it, I fear the blood shed and it can happen, when will the immorality be seem for what it is. It is one thing to practice things of this nature in the privacy of your own home it is entirely another issue to force it into being a part of the Law.
This is just a brief over view I could site many scholars on these issues but it would not matter most in this class will not even venture to read this post like most people they are bent as my father would say to their own destruction.
My fear is because of the extent to which these causes go the progress made could be a detriment if reactionism sets in and it goes too far. I believe women should have the ability to vote, equal pay, and that law should be structured that when issues of incompatibility arise and no hope of reconciliation exists, marriage counseling by qualified moral individuals not associated with the Law system should be consulted first, second when that fails then the Law should be equitable in dividing assets and not like the revolving door I see today where women take a man to the cleaner ever so many years to live off of their hard work and savings and all he is left with is the ice trays and the bills and devoid of seeing his children.
I was married to my first wife for seven years and preached for 6 of those years, she cheated on me for all seven of those years we were married, on the court house steps after the divorce she asked if we could still be friends, and I never answered her, one year later she called me in Austin, Texas and asked me to move her and the children from Houston to Arlington Texas so I rented a U-Haul and went to Houston. I packed up what was there and she sent her mother and the children into the house to check it one more time (she wanted to talk privately), I was sitting on the passenger side of the U-Haul with the door open and she walked up and said I need you to forgive me for 3 things?, and I said “Ok it depend on what it is”. She said: “All of the times you thought I was cheating on you I was, Second I tried to Kill you, I tried to make you commit suicide”, I shook my head and walked away and gave no answer. To this day I have never answered the question because she has never repented of those issues and still tries to this day to make my life as uncomfortable as she can, She wasn’t there at the stop light when after the kids were told we were getting a divorce and I had taken them to get school supplies and as I was driving home, stopped by a stop light and looking over at my daughter in the passenger’s seat and her little blonde hair and tears in eyes ask a question I still can’t forget, “Will you still be my Daddy”. I remembered her words and would not answer my ex-wife because of it. I’ll tell you now lest I forget my ex-wife almost got her wish several times. Now all I asked God for is to live one minute longer than she does, and I leave my wrath In his hands even though as Marine I could have stopped her life at 100 yards, I’m one of the best shots in the Marine Corp. but God is just not I, God is Wise, not I, God is Judge not I.
Second marriage I caught her, as you have read in a previous Discussion Board with her girl friend and cocaine, two strikes (cheating, Immorality, and drugs) I don’t tolerate it and I left with what was mine we both used the same lawyer never to speak again.
Third wife, vibrant, full of Life, could almost out work me as a Marine any day, forced to help a maintenance man move a heavy couch at her work (She was an Assistant Manager with two Children) while we only had been dating for one month. Something snapped in her back while moving the couch and she dropped to the ground and was instantly in pain and almost totally immobile. The pain so intense that at times she begged me to kill her and at times I had to keep our nine year old daughter at home to watch her for her own safety when it was necessary so I could work. She has CRPS 1 and Fibromyalgia (One is a nerve Pain with no cure, the other is Myofascial pain under the skin caused by the short circuiting nerves of the other condition) for 13 years, drugs keep the pain level down and she has two controllers in her spine to help as well. I Cook, I clean house, I wash dishes, I do laundry as I always have, I tended the children, I worked 40 hours a week plus, and I stayed because I love her for what she is, not for what she can do or how high her career status is, She is my Help meet. Life is hard sometimes, but God has provided and keeps us every day and has for the past 13 going on 14 years. This is my life, not the party life others have based on some socialite, or sexually immoral spoiled brat society or gender bending they made fun of me life, I am a Marine, I am a Cowboy, I am a Christian and as long as God allows I will walk this earth as a reminder to those who forgot Him and what this country is about. She had a career, a single mother with two kids, my daughter now 23 is married (I married them her and her husband before God), I was blessed to watch both of my grandchildren born from her and one my Grandson (born premature) is two and a half now, my Granddaughter is six months old, these are our children not the States and they will be told the truth and not some government dictated hedonist or humanistic doctrine espoused by men who think to highly of themselves or some committee in the United Nations floundering under a banner of the Humanist Manifesto IV or 2011.
Sorry for the length this subject would require volumes in order to fully discuss it and I am qualified to write them adequately, this is but a mere smattering and over view of what is involved. Not that this will be read by anyone or if it is that it will make a difference and I will leave you with these words to hear the Conclusion of the whole matter: “Fear God and keep His commandments for this is the whole duty of man (mankind) for God shall bring every work into judgment every secret thing, whether it be good or whether it be evil” Ecc. 12:13, you can’t claim ignorance when He (God) comes you have been warned by His Own Word.
Skip Pallo (Semper Fi)

Leave a comment

Filed under Philosophy, Religion, The 1960's

Who were the Hippies and how did they influence the culture of the 1960s?

Our Universities beg another question of it’s students:Who were the Hippies and how did they influence the culture of the 1960s?
Proper perspective in analyzing the sixties is the most important concept to remember, children who grew up with the threat of the nuclear holocaust drills, where the home was not perfect, and the collapse of Classical liberal idealism was immanent, but the ease of material gain was on the horizon and the influx of philosophies foreign to the traditions of American values presented an experiment in social culture which would eventually go terribly wrong. Colleges provided the impetus for this experiment because children being unwise are easily lead astray no matter how book smart they are, and where the movement gave rise to a culture of young people disenchanted with traditional values, seeking enlightenment in the drug culture of the day (The Age of Aquarius) and sought to make there mark and tried to undo the sins of their fathers, but as reality set in this would fail terrible. Groups were trying to get back to the garden (The garden of Eden) where life was simple, harmonious, and they could commune with God on a higher plane, a return to nature which made the ideals of Locke extremely palatable and would undo the christen ethic that built a great nation. Locke’s philosophy centers around man and man being the ultimate authority whose failures had already been seen for a hundred years in England, now enter the mix in American culture and ultimately would rip the fabric of our social culture which could never be repaired (Pandora’s Box). Hippies we call them armed with a philosophy of returning to nature created communes reflected in the Communist ideals taught by Marx and Engel’s and added to that drugs of Pot, LSD, Shrumes (Mescaline), and many others drugs while seeking enlightenment from the songs of the leaders of the day. The parties that ensued included, for those who are ignorant of the time period and its nature which would influence the children as well, orgies (sex at any cost) and the children were included in a lot of those instances. Many children died either by over dosing or by neglect, most were dirty, and hence we refer to them in society as those dirty old hippies. Sex with young children was common place and gave rise to such off shoots as The Children of God better known as The Little Whores for Jesus following a man named Moses (David Brandt Berg), see http://www.rickross.com/groups/family.html. The effects of this philosophy which convoluted the real truths which were about show their effects in our American culture and law system. Hippies accepted the amoral aspect of Atheism which presented itself from the Scientism of the day, books like “ I’m OK, Your OK.” by Thomas Anthony Harris and the influx of Transactional Analysis which is responsible for many tragedies, for instance after the United States Government adopted this philosophy and it caused such great harm in the U. S. Postal Dept. we remember it when we say “Someone’s gone Postal”, T.A. was responsible for it and was another experiment gone wrong in the sixties and caused many to commit suicide, and as a Christian counselor I remember it was discussed there, I work for the United States Treasure Department in the early 1970’s. The Hippie movement sought an alternative life style based on human invention and wisdom, human philosophy, and believed all authority including Government was “The Man” and he was responsible for suppressing everyone, he was evil. The social Scientist would see this as a natural struggle of humans for freedom and change and equality, the Christian see’s it as an apostasy (for there is no sin that is not common unto man and there is not new thing under the sun), the social scientist, the psychologist, and all other amoral disciplines offers a 12 step program and pill to ease the conscience and denies any responsibility in the experiments which ravages our nation to this very day. The only thing this type of understanding “Amoralism” accomplishes is the denial of God on the basis, science has already killed Him and forces society to accept the fact that only they the purveyors of the modern social science and medicine have the knowledge to fix the social evil of mankind. Deviant behavior viewed not from the aspect of Religious Morality but from the social amoral aspect which means nothing. If there is no God then all things are permissible (rape, incest, bestiality, homosexuality) all become a digression to the base nature of the liberating of mankind as an animal and as the Hippies of that day practiced and the creed of the amoral idealism which stretches to today are stated in the words of the high priest of Atheism “For me there are no rules none at all. The echoes of the hippie movement were upon the tongue of Madalyn Murray O’ Hair in one of my debates with her and the ORAL Majority where she stated in reference to the Gay movement of that day, “Well it’s natural the doggies do it.” To which I replied “They also do it with their young and kill them, do you espouse that as well”, she had no answer and to this good day they no longer use that argument in public. The sterile amoral aspects leave behind from the hippie movement all of the crying children chided by others with statements like “Who’s your Daddy”, “and Those bastard children”. The women who’s struggle for the freedom of their sexual prowess and equality to men left destitute and consigned the marriage contract as a mere witness of prostitution, and the men devoid of there position as heads of the household abandon relationships for the lack of care and trust in women from life in the commune and infused the after effects which left women and society wondered Why? and blamed men, and as we know ”A house divided against it self cannot stand”. Now is the War of the Sexes and adage as the articles of the sixties reflects “You’ve come a long way baby”. These are the men and women and children once called hippies who have sat at my desk in tears because the amoral never satisfies the Soul or reconciles the relationship with God, No 12 step program or pill does that, just ask Rep. Anthony Weiner. I will stop here the list is endless. No offense intended only the truth just as the children who asked me before, “Did mommy and daddy want me or was I an accident”, are they the Children of God or as Carl Sagan envisions from the amoral aspect “ You are an accident in Universe which didn’t have you in mind in the first place.”, protecting the immoral as a minority and under the banner of equal rights of the sixties as a constitutional right not recognizing it for what it is as a humanistic right and if you disagree just read the book I challenged you with, it right under the professors first statement in this discussion board as to what we truly are suppose to protect in our constitution provided by it laws and precepts which have been mislead over the years. Reactionism will come but Pandora ’s Box has already been opened and like the Nuclear Age we can never return without great upheaval and loss of life and sacrifice or we are doomed to becoming nothing more than the deviant animals the Amoralist believes we are, with government adding Law after Law to restrict and bind society and makes us a part of the system which was suppose to have Liberty and Freedom and there will be no more God Bless America.
Skip (Semper FI)
For your reference:
See: The Christian Life and Character of the Civil Institutions of the United States, Developed the Official and Historical Annals of the Republic by B. F. Morris (Benjamin Franklin Morris) 1864 documentation on the constitutions of most of the states of the union from the inception of this nation.
http://books.google.com/books?id=H92keUU_Xy8C&pg=PA23&lpg=PA23&dq=%22Christian+Life+and+Character+of+the+Civil+Institutions+of+the+United+States,%22+%22B.F.+Morris%22+OR+1864+-reprinted&source=bl&ots=VhZsqK9JcV&sig=xK4_EltMMCM0kp0QSKkgKKZQ3t4&hl=en&ei=DFD6TYjnHeqy0AGb5tG1Aw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCMQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q&f=false

The original book is now in reprint again after 100 years of silence.

Leave a comment

Filed under Philosophy, Religion, The 1960's

We are not protected

constitutional-law-by-carl-miller

Citizen’s Rule Book

It is some what sobering to read the early fathers of this country and recognize that they saw it necessary to swear allegiance to this country in a solemn oath as a matter of being a citizen of this great nation and those who were in alliance with other nations or swear allegiance to any foreign ideologies or plotting to over throw this countries ideals were considered traitors and treasonous and they were sought out and either imprisoned or deported after the signing of the constitution, our families were immigrants who came here seeking a new life in a free country and had to swear allegiance to it when now foreign nationals (illegal immigrates in to California estimated at between 10,000 to 50,000 people under the banner of Socialism) are openly trying to over throw this country and its ideals, they say they are protected by our Constitution that they are openly trying to over throw and living in this country off its welfare an the leader of this country is telling immigration not to arrest them and wants to grant them open citizenship without them showing allegiance to it, this is not only criminal it is a complete disregard for the sacredness for which our forefathers lost their lives and is an out right plot against us as Americans. See: http://www2.hernandotoday.com/content/2010/may/23/la-reconquista-politics-ethnic-conflict/
The conflicts are coming and our border are not protected
Skip Pallo (Semper Fi)

Leave a comment

Filed under Communism, Constitution, Our Borders, Political Correctness, Religion, Uncategorized

There is a principle in Sociology called the Thomas Theorem.

This blog is a response to a professor on:
Thanks for getting us started Axxxx. There is a principle in Sociology called the Thomas Theorem. The basic premise of this theorem is that what is perceived as reality by people becomes real in its consequences. That is, something can become real just because people perceive that it is real. I wonder if that theorem comes into play when we discuss this threat. Communism, as a political ideology, was certainly on the rise in some countries and it happened that it also rose up in countries where totalitarian rulers had gained control. Couple those factors with the increasing globalized economy in which all countries were striving to become major players and you have a competitive cauldron beginning to boil. I am not proposing that the threat was contrived as much as I am playing devil’s advocate to spark further discussion by suggesting that the environment existed in which an evil threat could be identified to focus the country on a threat.
I think my answer was relevant:
Prof
If you are fishing I might as well go down the hole since your going down that vein and expose the intent.
We will start with Jeremy Bentham and the pleasure principal which was not congruent with the frame work of the Constitution in its Ideology nor was it for English Law or the Common law which he set out to undo. Believing he could devise a better system based on his knowledge of Law as attested in the Pannomion and yes he was by some a prodigy and even tried to get our founding father’s to accept his Ideals for setting the foundations in this country and they were completely Rejected by Samuel Adams and the Committee on Constitutional Reform and many others in the 1800’s, they knew then that the ideologies he proposed based on human reasoning and not on a Supreme Law of the Creator were nothing more that theory and not practice as attested to in John Adam’s three volumes:
John Adams
Vol. I-III especially in
Vol III History of the Principal Republics in the World.
London
1794

And the ideals set forth proven in time for a thousand years of history as the fatal flaw in all governments that man rights are endowed by a Creator. see
The Rights of Man.
for the use and Benefit of all Mankind.
By Thomas Paine
London
1795
Starting pg 4…
Pg. 5 hand of his Maker
Pg. 6 unmake man (we are warned of the Atheistic threat here).
Pg. 7 male and female (natural order of God expressed here)
and the use of Natural Law is within the confines of the
understanding of The laws of the Creator, not in man or like
England’s Law the People as the Supreme Power
or
Rights of Man:
Being an Answer to Mr Burke’s Attack on the French Revolution
Seventh Edition
With a Preface to George Washington
By Thomas Paine
1791
Pg 47-.

Theories are not something you base your law system on, it is fallacious to even conceive of, yes, men can lead people down a road by simply making a continuous statement till it is considered fact or becomes a self full filling Prophesy as in the assumption of evolutionary theory and thought, and yes I understand I would need to clarify for the unlearned in this subject as to the specifics, all Christians believe in a form of evolution we are not talking about changes within the species which are congruent with the “The Law of Biogenesis. This was espoused by Pasteur (who was a Bible believing man) we are talking about ultimate origins as he disproved spontaneous generation by his swan neck experiment and the contents remain sterile in the Institute De Pasteur to this very day, but it is not the issue this is only the smoke screen and conman’s game. This issue of Evolution fails the first three criteria for the Scientific method which are Observation (not in theory), second Repeatable (not in theory) and Universal (not in theory) as I have stated before these are matter of Religion and Philosophy not Science and those who choose to try to prove this Ideology are conmen. The struggles are in Ideology stretching back to the days of the Greeks and the likes of Anaximander who said we came from fishes which prompted Sir Henry Haeckel to altar the original wood cuts (for producing printed copies) of one of his colleges and give us the gill slits of the embryo which are still published to this day and were a lie from the beginning as he was called before a College court and totally discredited in his life time which by the way Wikipedia never mentions (go figure), but the gill slits live on as a easy way to support the issue but it’s a lie. Ontogeny does not recapitulate Phylogeny”(note the American Medical Association no longer holds a list of Vestigial Organs from that theory “ Science triumphs over itself, we found out they are necessary”), the gill slits were folds of skin that become the nasal pharynx region as you learn in Biology (they weren’t gills, they never were gills, did you misunderstand they were never gills), this is the stupidity with which this argumentation exists for props and proofs and muddies the water of the ideology we discuss supported by science. As for the Thomas Theorem and its derivatives are used in science to mask the issue and the secularization of its understanding of our political views as espoused in the textbook Power and Society that we owe our constitutionality to Classical Liberalism and John Locke which is not the truth even Thomas Jefferson a Universalist was wise enough not to bind on the Constitution, even though he desired it in his writings others knew the dangers of and the end results of a Humanist and Atheistic Government which has its basis not on a Creator and a Supreme Law but on man as the sole authority of existing and it leads to Hedonism and the complete dissolution of the law and governments and hence the danger of Jeremy Bentham who kept hidden in his writings on the freeing of the homosexual community he sought to release, fearing the wrath of the English government, and is rearing its ugly head again espousing his writings in our society proposing this type of Philosophy. It was never the intent of the founding fathers to have our government separate from the morals of religion and make it an Atheistic or Humanistic Government and anyone who espouses that effort is blind to history and ideology (in doing so you bind and outlaw Religion) and these type of men needs to tread carefully our Freedoms and Liberty are at stake. The axiomatic principal has always been an understood “Where there is no Law there is no Sin” in other words when you make no law concerning something you do not bind it or cause it to be bound as in the Constitutional statement:”Congress shall make no Law concerning Religion”, not to outlaw it or restrict it but to protect it and its freedoms.
This is not a rant it is a warning from History, I do not seek to offend, only to tell the truth, do your research, and yes I have in my library over a thousand volumes on this subject and if you need references I can supply them for you, or use Google books as a resource and learn.
Skip Pallo (Semper Fi)

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Do you think that America’s fear of a Communist takeover during the 1960s was valid?

The question comes from a University Discussion board.

It makes me ill to my stomach to think of how little regard we have for the blessings we are afforded in this country. We are the only country founded on the ideal of our Rights being endowed by a Creator unlike all others before it. See these books they can be found on Google books for your reading:
The Rights of Man.
for the use and Benefit of all Mankind.
By Thomas Paine
London
1795
Starting pg 4…
Pg. 5 hand of his Maker
Pg. 6 unmake man (we are warned of the Atheistic threat here).
Pg. 7 male and female (natural order of God expressed here)
and the use of Natural Law is within the confines of the
understanding of The laws of the Creator, not in man or like
England’s Law the People as the Supreme Power
or
Rights of Man:
Being an Answer to Mr Burke’s Attack on the French Revolution
Seventh Edition
With a Preface to George Washington
By Thomas Paine
1791
Pg 47-.
Or how threats to government in history happen See:
A defense of the constitutions of government of the United
States
John Adams
Vol. I-III especially in
Vol III History of the Principal Republics in the World.
London
1794
pg.284.
These volumes show the ignorance all man kind has had through out history at the threat of despotism.
The German People fell in one day to the likes of Hitler and his regime but they were not the first nor would they be the last. Military strategists are all well aware of the issues in toppling governments and how to take over nations. So much for my preface now the Question: Was the fear of a Communist take over valid during the 1960’s? With out a doubt, it was the same problem that existed in pre WWI and WWII in this country, we as a nation were merely pacifists and the conscience of the US like in the 1960 was one of not wanting another War or even the thought of War, yet it had to be brought in front of the people to make the majority aware of it’s constant presence. At the dinner table most were not thinking about the posturing of the Nations of America and Russia which we were constantly in, only some who were aware of what the impact the Viet Nam Conflict would have. The cat and mouse games that the nuclear age forced us into and our Air Force and our Navy when we launched the first nuclear sub in 1954, the year I was born showed to the world the constant threat that existed before the 1960’s and it was real. The domino principal was well known by all the military strategist during the sixties, the naiveté of the general public only remembering we won the War and not the constant diligence of the impending difficulties with Russian, Korea (The forgotten War) because the nuclear threat was not going away and it is showing itself again in the ludicrous actions being tolerated by your President with Korea today and their nuclear threat, it is beyond imagination. Anyone who looks only at the debacles of our Government and the United Nations ill devised and advised plans for a free world and only seeing us as a nation of aggressors to be blamed, not recognizing the infinite difficulties of the threats out there and what happens when as I have said before in the quote: “ All it takes for evil to prosper is for good men to do nothing.” , so if you believe that we can just sit around and leave the rest of the world to fall and everything will be OK you apparently don’t know what happened in WWII (Video on the Cold War See all Eleven videos by mediarichlearning: http://www.google.com/search?q=mediarichlearning&tbo=p&tbm=vid&source=vgc&hl=en&aq=f)  or your self absorbed life devoid of Historical facts and wisdom doesn’t recognize a threat until it is upon you and it is. Islam and the Mahometans as well as Communism are here and who’s influence has been here since 1919 (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_USA). If we fall from within or without as we have learned from Viet Nam and from many other nations all free countries will follow as in the domino principal and their will be no more Freedom or Liberty or Justice, we teeter on the edge of our existence and the world will be returned to the Dark Ages and the Bastille. If we continue to be mislead by revisionist historians like in our book Power and Society that we owe our existence to the Classical Liberalism which is a fantasy, which banners itself under Rational Religion or better known as Atheism then we are one step closer to loosing all of our freedoms and it is the reason we have almost lost most of our liberty today by the chipping away by modern ideologies based on Hegelian thought as is Communism. We owe our freedoms to the understandings of being endowed by a Creator and the Christian Religion dating back as far as the Age of Chivalry as part of their Oath to God as a Knight to defend and take care of the poor and orphans and women and to educate them and yes I can prove what I say all the way up to the Order of the Garter and they were not Classical Liberals back then. I can show it historically but so can you if you know your History, Religion and your Ideology or else you are doomed to repeat the failures of those in past, this is my expertise and has been for 30 years in debating the likes of Madalyn Murray O’Hair and Glen Maxey of the Oral Majority until she was killed by one of her own people.
We as a nation need to have a little more of a scholarly approach in evaluating truth in a matter instead of what is given to us in a 30 second sound byte or on a handout to be studied or a blog to be read especially with those who would put their own philosophical slant on things and mislead the masses and let’s look at what was really was happening and be honest for one minute as scary as Nuclear Posturing during the 1960’s was so it is still today and nothing has changed it is still a threat, ask any of our Navy personnel stationed on any Nuclear Submarine today the game goes on and  we are not even aware of how dangerous it gets.

Skip Pallo (Semper Fi)

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

an “infinite” person

I am Andrew Joseph Pallo III and Prefer Skip, married to my third wife with 9 children, I am a United States Marine (Viet Nam Era), I am a father, a preacher, a debater and marriage counselor for 30 years, I am a singer and song writer for over 30 years my band is Skip’s Crystal Blue Country (SCBC) , I am a Bible translator both in Hebrew and Greek and study early English History and American History. I work as an Exchange Administrator for the Army at present and am attending Kaplan for a BS in Information Technology, Information Security and Forensics.

The question comes in a University I am attending What is an infinite person?

I have read some of the posts and it seems a little open ended not only in the question but in the answers given. Critical thinking demands that we evaluate correctly information given to us with the rules of proper interpretation. For those who think it is correct not to judge things you fool your selves, open mindedness is not equated with  foolishness. If you stand for nothing you fall for everything. For those who out of political correctness which is the poison and constipation of our society hiding those who not only seek to be immoral but damage society and social ethics in the process. The philosophy comes out of Hegelian Thought, which is Liberal thought and it has nothing to do by the way with being a liberal giver it has to do with the denial of the 2 story universe, the denial of the spiritual and the soul. Without Soul there is no music no art. Art and Music mimic Life as we strive to achieve an understanding of the Creator above and create, express and mimic our understanding of that. Humanities is not Humanistic those are contrary terms, Humanity is the nature of man and Humanistic is a philosopher (Dictionary of the English Language 1768, Samuel Johnson), who doesn’t believe in God. A man once said: “I can see how a man can look at the ground all day long and say there is no god but to lift his eyes to the lofty Heavens above and say there is no God this I cannot understand” Abraham Lincoln. Those who sit in the lofty towers teaching philosophies which neither promote goodness nor show men how to proper discern evil and confuse young minds in the process do both the Academic field and those they teach an injustice and are responsible for the problems which Ken Robinson alludes to in his video. An infinite person used in this sense hyperbolically but without definition it can be infinitely evil and in the case of Hitler, or Jeffery Dalmer, or Charles Manson or Madalyn Murray O’Hair these men and women left an eternal impression on our world but not for good they are infinite, infinitely evil an there are those who like the Judeo-Christian believers know Jesus or like men of such stature as William Penn or Martin Luther King who stand timeless for their contributions to history and humanity. Take a stand ladies and gentleman and have a passion for at least the truth if nothing else and if it offends someone they may need to be offended if they are not in search of Truth and Right. My songs, my writings and my quest is for Truth and dispelling not only ignorance but exposing truth. The traits of the infinite are never compromising, never standing with immorality or evil, but again it is the question infinitely evil or infinitely good, and open minded enough to know the difference not herded like sheep but following music of a distant drum. I follow the country side, my son is heavy metal side he played for Force Fed before they went international, one of my daughters went Country and went through college on a music scholarship at Oklahoma State. No one is perfect but it doesn’t give us license to stand for that which is wrong, men of stature does not mean they are perfect but they stand to protect it and its concepts and precepts. Art has definition lest we think Frank Zappa taking a crap on stage is Art, one only has to see and smell what is being proposed to know to know what it is, don’t be deceived some things are not art or music know the difference, like the world around you which has natural laws which we acknowledge and mimic, some things should not to be mislabeled.

Here is my Quote so hear me Well…

“Political Correctness is the Constipation of the Freedom of Speech ”

Skip Pallo (Semper Fi)

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized